>1st,do you even know what "people of kashmir " is? kashmir is a small area and also there are kashmiri pandits. porkies illegally occupied "jammu" not "kashmir" but still porks calls "jammu" as "azad kashmir"
Re-read what I wrote. I chose my words very carefully to specifically point out that it's the vast bulk of the valley's people who want us out. Never made any claim about 90 per cent of J&K's whole population being anti-india or even 90 per cent of ethnic kashmiris being anti-India (which is not possible because it would include several lakh kashmiri pandit refugees).
Again, my issue is not with the fundamental idea that the vale needs to be integrated with mainland India. My problem is how Right wingers online seem to be attacking the problem wrongly by raising points which the other side can easily falsify in front of a neutral observer.
Even RW 'experts' like Abhijit Iyer Mitra and OSINT accounts have established that the protests did indeed take place recently in the Indian part of J&K. Obviously I know that BBC, Al Jazeera, etc are biased organisations but that bias doesn't mean that they're fabricating their footage, although they're clearly giving their own biased interpretation of it. (claiming that stonepelters are peaceful protesters).