Reply
Hide
4096 characters remaining
Max filesize: 3.00 MB, Max files: 3
More

/b/ - बकlol

बोलो जुबाँ केसरी
anon4e066109/07/2019 (Tue) 06:51:2215076Reply
>be sita
>get kidnapped and raped
>eventually get used to it and have consensual sex with Ravana everyday
Why was she such a whore and why was Ram such a cuck
anonfa4d4509/07/2019 (Tue) 08:37:4315086Reply
Weak bait mate , try better next time abdul
anon1facff09/07/2019 (Tue) 08:50:2515088Reply
>>15076
nice try katwe
anonfd8d3409/07/2019 (Tue) 09:15:4215091Reply
>le Muslim boogeyman
im a rajpoot
anon025a0409/07/2019 (Tue) 10:42:1115092Reply
>>15091
What's the difference
anonc3839d09/07/2019 (Tue) 12:18:2815100Reply
>>15091
Top kek rajchoots are the flag bearers of cuck association of the world.
Such a disgrace being a rajchoots.
anon933f9a09/07/2019 (Tue) 17:45:0815138Reply
anon6b730410/07/2019 (Wed) 08:56:5215171Reply
>>15091
Don't you have your sister to marry off to a Katwa?
anon39c67010/07/2019 (Wed) 09:20:5015173Reply
>>15171
Top kek
anondc226d11/07/2019 (Thu) 08:10:0415313Reply
>>15076
Still better than Probet Mooohammed who had to fuck a 9 year old because his dick wasn't able to hit the cervix of a normal woman
anon942e4b11/07/2019 (Thu) 08:14:1915315Reply
>>15313
You are just jealous that he got a young tight pussy while you have to put up with a lose ugly foid.
anon75f91c11/07/2019 (Thu) 09:15:0615322Reply
>>15315
9 year old is too young to fuck. Any kind of child being fucked is disgusting. Pedobhangis need to get shot
anon9add0611/07/2019 (Thu) 09:27:3115324Reply
>>15323
Hello ACP Pradyuman
anoncc044411/07/2019 (Thu) 09:34:2115325Reply
>>15323
10/10 would smash
anon75f91c11/07/2019 (Thu) 09:36:5615326Reply
>>15323
Neck yourself pedo. Child diddling is what the medievals practiced. Revulsion at it is the sign of being grown up.
anondc226d11/07/2019 (Thu) 10:06:1515327Reply
>>15315
>9 year old undeveloped vagina
>jealous
Abdoools are Abdoools. Never changed throughout the course of history.
anonc3839d11/07/2019 (Thu) 10:17:1415328Reply
>>15323
We need to bust nonce and rid the filth in this cuntry first.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 13:21:3215330Reply
lol,Dindcucks seething hard itt
>>15315
THIS.Mullahs get all qt prime girls while Dindus betabuxx 35 yo blown out foids.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 13:31:3215331Reply
>>15326
>>15327
>>15322
13-14 is the best age,anyone man who denies attraction to pre-teen foids is just a closet hebephile .
anone8941f11/07/2019 (Thu) 13:56:3815334Reply
>>15331
>Pedophillic
13-14 aren't pre-teens, they are teens, teens aren't kids hence it's not pedophilia, hebephilia and ephebophilia used to be normal (and still is in non jew azn countries). It's only in cucked nations influenced by Victorian morals they are treated as kids instead of sexually active individuals.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 14:05:2615335Reply
>>15331
>hebephilia and ephebophilia used to be normal
True,I just find it hypocritical that Hindus will try to ape the west by falling for the pedo-hysteria when child marriage was(and still is in remote areas) common in the country.
anon75f91c11/07/2019 (Thu) 14:15:2615336Reply
>>15335
And child marriage is rightfully condemned by the media. Do you not realize how fucked up it is? Most women that were married young never properly grew up. I know one girl that ran away with a boy when they were just 14. She was around thirty but seemed mentally retarded compared to 10 year olds. Child marriange and untouchability/casteism were and remain the bane of this country.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 14:26:4815338Reply
>>15336
Wrong.Marrying women young(13-16) has and always will be essential to a functional society.This is how it has always been in traditional societies throughout the world.Such societies will always enjoy a demographic advantage over modern ones

>women that were married young never properly grew up
lol right,women must have 20 bf before they "grow up".
anonaa9f9511/07/2019 (Thu) 14:48:5015339Reply
>>15336
Most women in the West lose virginity by the age of 13-15 and they don't have a problem. Yours is a cultural problem. Chiefly men and women are taught to repress their sexuality at that age. And the solution we make is to repress their sexuality even farther which worsens the problem(I've heard some self proclaimed make feminists talking about wanting to increase the age of marriage from 21 to 27 for makes because that's when they'll be able to support a family these days).
I truly hate centrists/tradcucks/cuckservatives. Either just be a tradchad accepting child marriage if you care so much about muh traditional family values, letting teenagers grow normally afterwards (like how it was done before, they didn't expect much from a married male then even if he was married unless he was an adult) and allow teenagers to find sexual satisfaction at that age or just give up on this whole marriage shit and worrying about pre martial sex and let people do whatever they want.
anon75f91c11/07/2019 (Thu) 16:40:0515346Reply
>>15338
>>15339
I am not sure how you can see any benefit in allowing child marriages. Teenagers having sex is one thing. Abhimanyu and Rama fugged when they were 16, afterall. But teenagers exploring their sexuality is different than a teenage bride. Because in the case of former, the girl has her family to fall back onto. But marriage, at least in India, is different. Women don't just marry their husbands but their family. The amount of power that her in laws wield over women after marriage in India is unparalleled even amongst Arabs. That is why child/teenage marriage is a retarded idea. Because, once her husband fucks up, the girl will have no escape. I am not a tradcuck, so I don't care about preserving some abstract platonic ideal of culture, because cultures are and should be always changing. In fact the only reason I even bother considering myself a Hindu is because I still wear my yajnopavit and feel that Hindu mythology is the coolest in the world.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 17:01:5315347Reply
>>15346

You are a tradcuck.The only reason you think marrying young is wrong is because you think muh womyn are "oppressed" in a traditional marriage.
>teenagers exploring their sexuality >different than a teenage bride
which is exactly why traditional socities are more robust.good luck having a stable relationship with a woman who has taken 25 cocks prior to marriage.
>her in laws wield over women
typical feminist nonsense.traditional families are generally happier than modern ones where women hold absolute power.
>Cultures are and should be always changing
but should always favor roasties right.Dont complain when other religions overtake you demographically then.
anon75f91c11/07/2019 (Thu) 17:07:1015350Reply
>>15347
>Wants literal child marriages to be enabled
>Dont complain when other religions overtake you demographically then
Abe chutiye, if you like Islam so much toh khatna Kara lo. Islam isn't going to overtake hinduism in lundiya barring exceptions such as Kerala or Kashmir. Regressing back to retarded customs because muh demography is literally bhaktbhangi tier intellect. You might as well demand sati to be made mandatory for Hindu women.
anon9add0611/07/2019 (Thu) 17:10:3015351Reply
>>15350
Sati was a voluntary practice. It was never mandatory
Go be katua somewhere else
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 17:16:4515353Reply
>>15350
>Abe chutiye, if you like Islam
Dindunigger triggered
>Islam isn't going to overtake hinduism
Keep dreaming.Ek din teri ma/behen ko hum randikhane me bechenge.
>literally bhaktbhangi
they are rostie enabling cucks like you.
>sati to be made mandatory for Hindu women.
Sati was a honorable Aryan way for women to die.tradcucks like you wont understand
anon75f91c11/07/2019 (Thu) 17:30:4815357Reply
>>15351
>Sati was voluntary
Is that what they teach you at your shakha? We have several literally thousands of instances where women were forced on the funeral pyre. This is not the hill you want to die on.
>>15353
>Sati was a honorable Aryan way for women to die.tradcucks like you wont understand
Women being brainwashed into burning themselves over the death of their husbands isn't honorable lmao. And it's a good thing that practice was abolished. Either ways you are pretty retarded so there's no point in continuing this conversation. But I must admit that this revisionist nonsense along with the Indo Aryan autochthonism is why no one intelligent considers dindutvavaadins to be be people worth engaging. The world will keep changing. Adhering to any dogma is inherently regressive. You need to keep changing your ideals with times so that they adapt to modernity. Failing to do so will simply result in the eradication of imperfect dogmas. There were thousands of pagan religions two millennia ago. They were all wiped out by Christianity and Islam. Now in a few more decades Christianity itself will die in Europe and zealous Muslims will be the relevant religious force the word over.
If hinduism cannot eradicate caste discrimination and child marriages then it deserves it's extinction.
anon4c99f711/07/2019 (Thu) 17:46:2315359Reply
>>15357
Haridas Thakur, a Muslim who converted to Dharma, would chant the names of Shri Hari until the sun came up. The sultan got worried and sent a Muslim prostitute to tempt him out of his Bhakti. He said to wait until he’s done chanting. He never did. She ended up chanting with him.
anond4be7711/07/2019 (Thu) 17:47:1515360Reply
>>15359
To hum kya kare bahinchod
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 17:51:4115361Reply
>>15357
You never explain why young marriage is harmful for a society you just subjectively believe its "bad" and "regressive" and go off on a tangent about pagan religions,their demise ,islam and what not Try and stay on topic retard.

>isn't honorable
It is for a warlike culture that incorporates the concept of honor in its societal fabric.but as i said soycucks wont understand.
>no one intelligent
retard thinks evryone who dosent agree with his women-worshipping ways lacks intelligence.
>dogma is inherently regressive
I mean its 2019 people come on
>changing your ideals with times
but acc. to you only if they benefit roasties instead of overall society.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 18:01:2715362Reply
>>15359
Typical cucked Dindu.Lord Hari would have wanted him to prove himself by ravaging the muslim whore.He is now burning in hell for this sin.
anonf683a111/07/2019 (Thu) 18:02:4715363Reply
>>15357
Sati was just a rajpoo think and you know rajpoos, they are retarded, don't blame whole dindoos for their retardation.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 18:07:5815364Reply
>>15363
Cope,understand that such customs may seem barbaric to us but are common in a warlike fedual world.
anond45e5a11/07/2019 (Thu) 18:09:0015365Reply
>>15361
>It is for a warlike culture that incorporates the concept of honor in its societal fabric.but as i said soycucks wont understand.
Even that doesn't change the fact that it is retarded. Besides the dehumanising aspects of burning someone alive will create far more psychopaths than this country could handle.
>retard thinks evryone who dosent agree with his women-worshipping ways lacks intelligence.
Lel. You are barely able to type in parsable English, you fucking schizo. I don't need to look at your arguments to realize your lack of intelligence.
>but acc. to you only if they benefit roasties instead of overall society.
Literally what makes you think that cancelling child marriages wouldn't help males? The brain doesn't become fully developed till you are 25. That gives both sexes plenty of time to complete education and start their careers. That is why marrying after that age is important. Child marriage is just going to create far more fuckups than anyone in this shithole can handle.
anond45e5a11/07/2019 (Thu) 18:17:4415366Reply
>>15363
Sati is literally mentioned in rig Veda and mahabharata. As a custom, it predates the fucking sakas by at least a thousand years.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 18:21:0515367Reply
>>15365
>fact that it is retarded
Explain how it is retarded nigger.The medieval world was a dark place and such things still happen in remote areas of the world
>dehumanising aspects
soycuck.jpg
>look at your arguments
>your lack of intelligence
funny because all you have is retarded name calling instead.
>fully developed till you are 25
even i true you do not need to debate your wife to have children retard
>complete education and start their careers
so you are a cuck who want his wife to have careers and fuck her boss lol.enjoy your blown out rostie whore and your divorce retard.
yet yu
anon9add0611/07/2019 (Thu) 18:23:1015368Reply
>>15367
>retarded /pol/cuck is seething so bad he can't even type properly
Go outside for 5 minutes
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 18:25:2915369Reply
>>15368
> muh /pol/
Dont tell me those retards live rent-free in your head.
anon95bd9a11/07/2019 (Thu) 18:25:5415370Reply
>>15361
Other than simple biological issues regarding death during child birth, do you really think a 9 year old understands what marriage is? You do remember being 9, right? It makes a farce out of the entire thing, one party to the contract is literally mentally retarded. Also, speaking from personal experience, I have a grandmother who was married off at 9 and immediately put to work cooking and cleaning for my whole gaon side clan, a 9 year old was cooking for 20+ people by herself. Pisses me off everytime I think about it, I regret everytime I touched those chaamars feet.

Jauhar and sati are two distinct practices, though the latter might have been derived from the former. Sati was primarily involuntary and often carried out by greedy relatives as a property grab while Jauhar was voluntary and only carried out as a last measure against rape. The whole population commited ritual suicide, the men just did it with a heroic last sally.

Roasties suck, but just as retarded nepotist UCs provided the chaamars with valuable ammo, practices like Sati give ammo to them. Treat everyone equally, is that so hard?
anonf683a111/07/2019 (Thu) 18:27:2215372Reply
>>15350
BTW saying something is bad because Islam does it is not an argument. That's just your value judgement, if Islam survives despite that but Hinduism doesn't then it proves Islam's objective supremacy as an ideology(which you seems to be agreeing on in the above passage).
>>15346
Abhimanyu and Rama married IIRC. I think there was a BBC documentary about chid marriage in India. It's not as evil as it was trying to play it out as, the kids still lived with their parents, they were only formally husband and wife. I don't see how it's any different from a teenage romantic relationship other than commitment being long term and traditionally enforced.
Anyways I'm all for the entire institution of marriage to be abolished. However I agree with tradchads that if you care so much about muh family values, then do it the tradchad way instead of trying to keep your foot on two boats. If you care for collective happiness, then you'll have to sacrifice some level of individual happiness and that includes muh female happiness(and male happiness too). There's a reason why most financially independent women don't have stable families. Trying to repress their sexuality in the name of muh family and traditional values is not going to work out well. You talked about that 14 year old foid, right? The whole ordeal wouldn't have happened if they were let to 'marry'(in that both parties families formally agreed to marry them off once of age and let them have it their way, why one of them will eventually get tired in the relationship instead of the guy being stuck with a mentally retarded womanchild) from their teenage. This whole thing wouldn't have happened where teenage sexuality isn't repressed like in the West, they would have broken up in an year.
And yes, you are a tradcuck.
anond3d1bf11/07/2019 (Thu) 18:30:4615373Reply
>>15366
And? Most of dindooism has hardly anything to with vedas, I can't think of a time when Indra was relevant in the last 1000 years. Most of dinduism was puranic or agamic. There is little to no evidence of its prescribe outside of rajpooland.
anonc46b1d11/07/2019 (Thu) 18:31:4715374Reply
>>15357
>>15373
*it's practice
anona2fdaf11/07/2019 (Thu) 18:35:0315375Reply
>>15366
I mean you really don't make sense when you say both devdasi and sati system, which ascribes wildly two different fates for Hindu women were universal for Hindus.
anon3554a211/07/2019 (Thu) 18:39:2015376Reply
>>15370
>gives personal anecdote
life was hard just 50 years go i am sure your 9 yo grandad face just as much if not more hardship.
Fact is young marriage with a virgin leads to less infidelity and stable relationships in general.
>Sati and Jauhar
>UC are responsible for sati
Wrong.As i said these customs were just a product of their times.Blaming modern hindus for it is as retarded as blaming modern Americans for slavery.
>Treat everyone equally, is that so hard
Yes.Diffrent elements in society will never be equal.just look at the widening gender and religous divide in our country.One side will always hold an advantage.Accept it or be cucked.
anoneeeae511/07/2019 (Thu) 19:01:1215382Reply
>>15375
At literally no point did I say that devdasi was universal for Hindu women. Stop building strawmans. Sati however was noted by something unique to Hindus by everyone from Greeks to Al biruni. Akbar and Aurangzeb both tried to stop saying. Ironically, Aurangzebs Islamic orthodoxy gave him far more success in this regard than Akbar's leniency. Even he failed tho and it was Britons that ironically stamped it out. A fact that they are extremely proud of(along with ending slavery).
>Inb4 Raja Ram Mohan Roy
He was a social reformer who wrote letters to local governors. He deserves as much credit for banning sati as Kejriwal deserves credit for ending corruption in Delhi i.e. none at all.
anon87d5c411/07/2019 (Thu) 19:06:0815383Reply
>>15382
Unique to dindoos, but not all dindoos.
anonbcfc2d12/07/2019 (Fri) 01:20:4815417Reply
>>15376
Life was hard to different degrees for everyone yes, but forcing a kid into basically lifelong bonded labour was still exceptional even in those days. 9 years man, a class 3 kid. I was switching from pencil to pen in class 3.

Fact also is that young marriage leads to higher infant and mother mortality rate. There haven't been any psychological studies on child brides but I can't imagine it's too good either, it should have similar impact to childhood sexual abuse.

I'm not blaming anyone but a historical fact is a historical fact and it does give ammo to women, just as people like Aurangzeb give ammo to Hindu nationalists. In modern political discourse the trump card is victimhood.

I'm not saying force equal results, I'm saying treat everyone equally. The superior groups will rise to the top on their own merit, social equilibrium will be maintained if your society currently is perfectly balanced. Do away with reservations but don't start reservations for UCs as our ancestors did, it led to the degeneration of our elites. One of the markers for Kali Yuga is that anyone who wears a sacred thread will start being considered a Brahmin.
>Widening gender divide
Meme. The only concrete example I have seen is the prohibition issue in certain states, ones not known for liberalism mostly. A few hundred women in big Unis are demographically insignificant.
>Religious
Only an issue because of the organized ones, before that during our Golden Age we had several religions and they coexisted in mutual harmony for the most part. Treating everyone equally would have prevented the creation of Buddhism, mostly propped up by aspirant Vaishyas and followed by disillusioned Shudras.
anon21975812/07/2019 (Fri) 01:33:5015418Reply
>>15382
The princely states banned it of their own volition, over a period of ~20 years after the British ban. The issue was definitely debated hotly at the time even in Indian society and large groups of people supported Ram Mohun Roy from among the Bengali elite. The ban was a natural result of the dissemination of Western humanism among our elites(Including the monarchs of several major princely states at the time) and would likely have remained in place even if the British were defeated in 1857.


Delete

(Removes the file reference to the posts)

(Removes the saved files from the server)